International Physical Activity Questionnaire Reliability and Validity Systematic Review

. 2019 Oct 26;16(21):4128.

doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214128.

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activeness Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review

Affiliations

• PMID: 31717742
• PMCID: PMC6862218
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214128

Complimentary PMC article

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review

Xiaofen D Keating  et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 .

Free PMC article

Abstract

This written report aimed to systematically review previous studies on the reliability and concurrent validity of the Global Concrete Activeness Questionnaire (GPAQ). A systematic literature search was conducted (northward = 26) using the online EBSCOHost databases, PubMed, Spider web of Scientific discipline, and Google Scholar up to September 2019. A previously developed coding sheet was used to collect the data. The Modified Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was employed to assess take chances of bias and study quality. Information technology was found that GPAQ was primarily revalidated in adult populations in Asian and European countries. The sample size ranged from 43 to 2657 with a wide age range (i.e., 15-79 years sometime). Different populations yielded inconsistent results concerning the reliability and validity of the GPAQ. Brusk term (i.e., one- to 2-week interval) and long-term (i.e., 2- to 3-month autonomously) test-retest reliability was good to very good. The concurrent validity using accelerometers, pedometers, and physical activity (PA) log was poor to off-white. The GPAQ data and accelerometer/pedometer/PA log data were not compared using the same measurements in some validation studies. Studies with more than rigorous research designs are needed before any conclusions concerning the concurrent validity of GPAQ tin can exist reached.

Keywords: adult physical action questionnaire; international perspective; revalidation.

Conflict of involvement statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure i

Menstruum chart of articles searched (Note: Some studies examined both reliability and validity and thereby the total North is greater than 26).

Like manufactures

• Cantankerous-cultural adaptation and validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire among good for you Hungarian adults.

  Ács P, Betlehem J, Oláh A, Bergier B, Morvay-Sey Grand, Makai A, Prémusz V. Ács P, et al. BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(Suppl one):1056. doi: ten.1186/s12889-020-08477-z. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32799854 Free PMC article.

• Reliability and Validity of the Self- and Interviewer-Administered Versions of the Global Concrete Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).

  Chu AH, Ng SH, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Chu AH, et al. PLoS I. 2015 Sep i;x(9):e0136944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136944. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26327457 Gratis PMC article.

• Reliability and validity of the French version of the global concrete activity questionnaire.

  Rivière F, Widad FZ, Speyer Due east, Erpelding ML, Escalon H, Vuillemin A. Rivière F, et al. J Sport Health Sci. 2018 Jul;7(iii):339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug fifteen. J Sport Health Sci. 2018. PMID: 30356654 Free PMC article.

• Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

  Meh 1000, Jurak G, Sorić M, Rocha P, Sember V. Meh Grand, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 April 26;18(ix):4602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094602. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 2021. PMID: 33926123 Free PMC article. Review.

• Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

  Hankins Yard, Fraser A, Hodson A, Hooley C, Smith H. Hankins Grand, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep;57(542):737-40. Br J Gen Pract. 2007. PMID: 17761061 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by 18 manufactures

• Concrete Function in Amateur Athletes with Lumbar Disc Herniation and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study.

  Miñambres-Martín D, Martín-Casas P, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Valera-Calero JA, Plaza-Manzano Chiliad. Miñambres-Martín D, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(half dozen):3743. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063743. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35329430 Free PMC article.

• Netball Shoots for Concrete and Mental Wellbeing in Samoa: A Natural Experiment.

  Richards J, Sherry E, Tamala F, Schuster Due south, Schulenkorf N, Keane L. Richards J, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Wellness. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2663. doi: ten.3390/ijerph19052663. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35270356 Free PMC article.

• Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and exam-retest reliability.

  Shakespear-Druery J, De Cocker K, Biddle SJH, Bennie J. Shakespear-Druery J, et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 Feb 14;8(1):e001225. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001225. eCollection 2022. BMJ Open up Sport Exerc Med. 2022. PMID: 35237446 Free PMC article.

• The Effects of Cardiorespiratory and Motor Skill Fitness on Intrinsic Functional Connectivity of Neural Networks in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.

  Jarrahi B, McEwen SC, Holschneider DP, Schiehser DM, Petkus AJ, Gomez ME, Van Horn JD, Filoteo V, Jakowec MW, Petzinger GM. Jarrahi B, et al. Encephalon Plast. 2021 Oct 19;7(two):77-95. doi: 10.3233/BPL-200115. eCollection 2021. Brain Plast. 2021. PMID: 34868875 Gratuitous PMC article.

• The Role of Health Literacy among Outpatient Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

  Rohwer East, Mojtahedzadeh N, Neumann FA, Nienhaus A, Augustin M, Harth V, Zyriax BC, Mache Southward. Rohwer E, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11743. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211743. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34831499 Free PMC commodity.

References

1. 1. Bull F.C., Maslin T.S., Armstrong T.P. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): 9 country reliability and validity study. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2009;6:790–804. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.6.790. - DOI - PubMed
2. 1. Armstrong T., Bull F. Development of the World Wellness Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) J. Public Health. 2006;14:66–70. doi: 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x. - DOI
3. 1. Chinapaw G.J.Thou., Mokkink Fifty.B., van Poppel G.North.M., van Mechelen West., Terwee C.B. Physical activity questionnaires for Youth: A systematic review of measurement backdrop. Sports Med. 2010;40:539–563. doi: x.2165/11530770-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
4. 1. Helmerhorst H.J.F., Brage S., Warren J., Besson H., Ekelund U. A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Deed. 2012;9:103–157. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-ix-103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
5. 1. Hidding L.M., Chinapaw Yard.J.M., van Poppel M.N.One thousand., Mokkink L.B., Altenburg T.Thou. An updated systematic review of childhood concrete action questionnaires. Sports Med. 2018;48:2797–2842. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0987-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resource

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
  • PubMed Key

• Medical

  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • MedlinePlus Consumer Health Information

milleramatc1950.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31717742/

Share this post